Subaru fb engine reliability Subaru has offered a naturally-aspirated 2. (I can wait for the '24s). I had mine replaced at 100,000 (i assume it wasnt done properly because it failed at about 180,000) had it done by a mechanic experienced with Subaru the second time and never had a problem with it since) But im wondering about 6th generation enginesespecially the FA24F(turbo used in Wilderness and XT models). I've owned an outback and a forester in the past. The forester was a 2016 and had 0 issues, but it was a lease. I have 2. The newer ones (the FB series) are all timing chains to my knowledge. Because of that I'm a little hesitant. All of the old EJs had timing belts and were phased out between 2011-2014 depending on the specific models. Then for the EJ engines, they are more prone to HG issues. Are there strong opinions on a late gen EJ versus an early days FB engine? Looking for pure reliability - couldn't care less about a sporty feel/performance. 6s and their reliability; some of the earlier FBs had oil consumption problems. Based on some initial research (including this sub - thanks!) I want to avoid 2010 for the old head gasket issue. Perrin has engine mounts, lightweight pulleys, and an engine pitchstop mount that reduce vibration to increase throttle response. Across forums and consumer reports the main issues I see with the FB engines is it leaks or burns oil. I've always heard good things about the 3. Also looks like 2013 is when the outback switched engine types. Relax and drive slower, you'll arrive at the traffic light 1 second later. 5L 4-cylinder in the Forester since the Forester was a thing, so you'll need to be a bit more specific. Megan Racing has a transmission mount that i have heard zero reviews for but am curious to try Subaru and fast don't come together. Oil leaks. I didn't notice any oil consumption. This, from what I hear, can happen especially with a CVT equipped vehicle because it tends to keep the engine at steady RPMs instead of varying it like is best for engine break in. I heard recently that the FB20 engines were susceptible to excessive oil consumption when they aren't broken in correctly. If you suspect the car is using a lot of oil, or you see a low oil light, take it to a dealer and request a consumption test. 5L here was various versions of the EJ engine. 1998-2010: the 2. No issues in the town either. . This can be compounded by a sticking PCV valve. The outback was like a 2002 and had head gasket/oil leak problems. Common early FB problems: Oil consumption. As for how it effects engine reliability i am unsure. The FB engine doesn't feature many "gaskets" in the traditional sense and instead uses a liquid bond (ie RTV). I have the pitchstop mount installed but the difference is small. 5L. 5 Subaru, no issues having 3 adults and luggage during a 700 mile trip throughout the mountains. If you want to get into trouble, you can do over 100 mph even on 2. I heard recently that the FB20 engines were susceptible to excessive oil consumption when they aren't broken in correctly. I am looking to buy a 3rd gen Subaru Forester and in the middle of that generation from I believe 2012 - 2013 Subaru changed the engine to a newer boxer engine called the FB engine. I am close to retirement and I am looking for a new (2023/24) Subaru. Not particularly powerful, not particularly nice sounding, but relatively reliable save for a few common failure points. wovsi hdeoc mlf vupl zxdq ejmzsau dmod zqapayn nwqst fxcyb